Bostock v. Clayton County
The Court held that Title VII's ban on sex discrimination protects gay and transgender employees.
Overview
Gerald Bostock was fired for joining a gay softball league, and other plaintiffs were fired for being transgender. Justice Gorsuch, for a 6-3 majority, applied textualism: discrimination based on homosexuality or transgender status necessarily entails discrimination based on sex, since changing the employee's sex would change the outcome, so Title VII prohibits it. The decision extended federal workplace protections to millions of gay and transgender employees nationwide and exemplified textualist methodology producing expansive outcomes, with ripple effects into education, health care, and housing law.
Related Topics
Dred Scott v. Sandford
Dred Scott, enslaved in Missouri, sued for freedom after residing in free states and territories with his owner. Chief Justice Tan...
Civil Rights Cases
The Civil Rights Act of 1875 required equal access to inns, theaters, and railroads regardless of race. Five consolidated prosecut...
Yick Wo v. Hopkins
San Francisco required wooden laundries to obtain operating permits, yet denied permits to virtually every Chinese applicant while...
Plessy v. Ferguson
Homer Plessy, seven-eighths white, was arrested for sitting in a whites-only railcar under Louisiana law in a deliberate test case...