Chevron v. Natural Resources Defense Council
The Court held that courts must defer to reasonable agency interpretations of ambiguous statutes the agencies administer.
Overview
The EPA defined stationary sources under the Clean Air Act with a plantwide bubble concept that eased compliance. Justice Stevens, for a Court with no dissenting votes, articulated the two-step framework: first ask whether Congress directly spoke to the precise question; if the statute is silent or ambiguous, defer to the agency's permissible construction. Chevron deference became the most cited doctrine in administrative law, empowering the modern administrative state and generating decades of debate. It was overruled in Loper Bright in 2024, which restored independent judicial judgment on statutory meaning and closed the Chevron era.
Related Topics
Fletcher v. Peck
Georgia's legislature, corrupted by bribery in the Yazoo land sales, rescinded millions of acres of grants, punishing innocent pur...
Dartmouth College v. Woodward
New Hampshire's legislature sought to convert private Dartmouth College into a public university after a trusteeship dispute. The ...
Charles River Bridge v. Warren Bridge
The Charles River Bridge Company claimed its charter implicitly barred Massachusetts from authorizing a competing toll bridge, arg...
Santa Clara County v. Southern Pacific Railroad
Southern Pacific Railroad challenged county property tax assessments on fences along its rights of way. Before oral argument, Chie...