City of Boerne v. Flores
The Court struck down the Religious Freedom Restoration Act as applied to states, asserting judicial authority over constitutional interpretation.
Overview
Congress enacted RFRA in 1993 to restore strict scrutiny for neutral laws burdening religion after Smith rejected such exemptions. A Texas church challenged a local historic landmark denial. Justice Kennedy, for a 6-3 majority, held that RFRA exceeded congressional enforcement power under the Fourteenth Amendment, since Congress may enforce constitutional rights as interpreted by the Court, not redefine their substance. Boerne established the congruence and proportionality test for enforcement legislation and formally claimed judicial supremacy in constitutional meaning. States responded by adopting their own mini-RFRAs, now numbering at least half the states.
Related Topics
Schenck v. United States
Charles Schenck, a socialist party official, circulated leaflets urging draftees to resist World War I conscription. Justice Holme...
Abrams v. United States
Jacob Abrams and four co-defendants printed leaflets attacking American intervention in Russia and urging workers to strike. The C...
Gitlow v. New York
Benjamin Gitlow, a socialist assemblyman, was convicted for publishing a manifesto advocating revolutionary socialism. The Court a...
Near v. Minnesota
Minnesota's public nuisance law allowed courts to shut down scandal-mongering newspapers. The Saturday Press, an anti-Semitic week...