Loving v. Virginia
The Court struck down laws banning interracial marriage as violations of equal protection and due process.
Overview
Richard and Mildred Loving, a white man and a Black woman, were sentenced to a year in jail for marrying in Virginia, with the sentence suspended on condition they leave the state for twenty-five years. Chief Justice Warren, for a unanimous Court, held that antimiscegenation laws were devices of white supremacy that violated equal protection, and that marriage is one of the basic civil rights of man. The decision ended three centuries of race-based marriage bans, and Loving is frequently cited in modern marriage equality jurisprudence as a foundation for the freedom to marry.
Related Topics
Dred Scott v. Sandford
Dred Scott, enslaved in Missouri, sued for freedom after residing in free states and territories with his owner. Chief Justice Tan...
Civil Rights Cases
The Civil Rights Act of 1875 required equal access to inns, theaters, and railroads regardless of race. Five consolidated prosecut...
Yick Wo v. Hopkins
San Francisco required wooden laundries to obtain operating permits, yet denied permits to virtually every Chinese applicant while...
Plessy v. Ferguson
Homer Plessy, seven-eighths white, was arrested for sitting in a whites-only railcar under Louisiana law in a deliberate test case...