Nebbia v. New York
The Court upheld milk price regulation, signaling the end of rigid judicial scrutiny of economic legislation.
Overview
New York set minimum milk prices to combat destructive price wars during the Depression, and store owner Leo Nebbia was convicted of selling two bottles below the floor. The Court, over dissent, upheld the law, holding that due process is violated only if a price regulation is arbitrary or discriminatory, and that states may regulate any business affected with a public interest. Nebbia loosened the liberty of contract straitjacket, and within a few years the Court stopped scrutinizing economic regulation under substantive due process entirely, clearing the way for the New Deal and the modern regulatory state.
Related Topics
Fletcher v. Peck
Georgia's legislature, corrupted by bribery in the Yazoo land sales, rescinded millions of acres of grants, punishing innocent pur...
Dartmouth College v. Woodward
New Hampshire's legislature sought to convert private Dartmouth College into a public university after a trusteeship dispute. The ...
Charles River Bridge v. Warren Bridge
The Charles River Bridge Company claimed its charter implicitly barred Massachusetts from authorizing a competing toll bridge, arg...
Santa Clara County v. Southern Pacific Railroad
Southern Pacific Railroad challenged county property tax assessments on fences along its rights of way. Before oral argument, Chie...