New York Times v. United States
The Court refused to block publication of the Pentagon Papers, rejecting prior restraint on the press.
Overview
The New York Times and Washington Post published a classified Defense Department history of the Vietnam War. The Nixon administration sought injunctions, arguing that publication endangered national security. The Court, in a brief per curiam decision with nine separate opinions, refused to enjoin publication, holding that the government had not met the heavy burden required to justify prior restraint. The decision affirmed Near v. Minnesota's near-absolute bar on censorship, cementing that even classified documents cannot be stopped absent grave, demonstrable, and immediate harm. The Pentagon Papers case remains the defining clash between secrecy and press freedom.
Related Topics
Schenck v. United States
Charles Schenck, a socialist party official, circulated leaflets urging draftees to resist World War I conscription. Justice Holme...
Abrams v. United States
Jacob Abrams and four co-defendants printed leaflets attacking American intervention in Russia and urging workers to strike. The C...
Gitlow v. New York
Benjamin Gitlow, a socialist assemblyman, was convicted for publishing a manifesto advocating revolutionary socialism. The Court a...
Near v. Minnesota
Minnesota's public nuisance law allowed courts to shut down scandal-mongering newspapers. The Saturday Press, an anti-Semitic week...