Pollock v. Farmers Loan and Trust
The Court struck down a federal income tax as an unapportioned direct tax, a ruling later reversed by the Sixteenth Amendment.
Overview
Congress enacted a modest peacetime income tax in 1894, and shareholders sued banks to stop payment. By a 5-4 vote, the Court held that taxes on income from property were direct taxes that must be apportioned among the states by population, a requirement making such taxes practically impossible. The ruling invalidated central federal revenue policy and ignited populist fury at the Court. Progressive criticism of Pollock fueled the ratification of the Sixteenth Amendment in 1913, which expressly authorized income taxes without apportionment and transformed the federal fiscal system.
Related Topics
Fletcher v. Peck
Georgia's legislature, corrupted by bribery in the Yazoo land sales, rescinded millions of acres of grants, punishing innocent pur...
Dartmouth College v. Woodward
New Hampshire's legislature sought to convert private Dartmouth College into a public university after a trusteeship dispute. The ...
Charles River Bridge v. Warren Bridge
The Charles River Bridge Company claimed its charter implicitly barred Massachusetts from authorizing a competing toll bridge, arg...
Santa Clara County v. Southern Pacific Railroad
Southern Pacific Railroad challenged county property tax assessments on fences along its rights of way. Before oral argument, Chie...