Powell v. Alabama
The Court reversed the convictions of the Scottsboro Boys, holding that defendants in capital cases are entitled to effective appointed counsel.
Overview
Nine Black teenagers were hastily tried and sentenced to death for allegedly raping two white women on an Alabama train, with a lawyer appointed only at trial. Justice Sutherland, for a 7-2 majority, held that due process requires appointment of counsel in capital cases where defendants are ignorant, illiterate, or otherwise incapable of mounting a defense, and that the appointment must occur in time to prepare. The decision began the constitutional right to counsel that culminated in Gideon, exposed the sham nature of the Scottsboro proceedings, and became an enduring symbol of due process under pressure.
Related Topics
Mapp v. Ohio
Cleveland police forced their way into Dollree Mapp's home without a valid warrant, allegedly searching for a bombing suspect, and...
Gideon v. Wainwright
Clarence Earl Gideon, tried for breaking into a Florida poolroom, was denied a court-appointed lawyer because Florida appointed co...
Miranda v. Arizona
Ernesto Miranda confessed to kidnapping and rape after two hours of police interrogation without being told of his rights. Chief J...
Katz v. United States
FBI agents attached an electronic listening device to the outside of a telephone booth used by bookmaker Charles Katz. The Court o...