Reed v. Reed
The Court held that a statutory preference of men over women in estate administration violates equal protection.
Overview
An Idaho law mandated that males be preferred over females when equally related persons sought appointment to administer an estate. Sally Reed and her estranged husband both petitioned to administer their son's estate. Chief Justice Burger, for a unanimous Court, held the preference unconstitutional because it established a classification determined merely by sex, without reasonable relation to any legitimate state objective. Reed was the first time the Court struck down a law for sex discrimination, opening the era of heightened scrutiny for gender classifications that followed in later equal protection cases.
Related Topics
Pierce v. Society of Sisters
Oregon's Compulsory Education Act, backed by the Ku Klux Klan and anti-Catholic sentiment, would have closed private and parochial...
Buck v. Bell
Virginia sterilized Carrie Buck, a young woman labeled feebleminded, under a eugenics statute. Her lawyer, colluding with the stat...
Griswold v. Connecticut
Connecticut law criminalized the use of contraceptives, and Planned Parenthood executive Estelle Griswold was convicted for counse...
In re Gault
Fifteen-year-old Gerald Gault was committed to a state institution until twenty-one for making a lewd phone call, without counsel,...