Regents of the University of California v. Bakke
The Court struck racial quotas in admissions but held that race may be considered as one factor among many.
Overview
Allan Bakke, rejected twice by the UC Davis medical school whose program reserved sixteen of one hundred seats for minority applicants, sued alleging discrimination. Justice Powell announced the judgment: a fixed quota violated Title VI, but universities could consider race as a plus factor in pursuit of the educational benefits of diversity, drawing on a Harvard admissions model. Four justices dissented on each side. Bakke established the diversity rationale that governed selective admissions for forty-five years, upheld in Grutter, until Students for Fair Admissions ended race-conscious admissions in 2023.
Related Topics
Dred Scott v. Sandford
Dred Scott, enslaved in Missouri, sued for freedom after residing in free states and territories with his owner. Chief Justice Tan...
Civil Rights Cases
The Civil Rights Act of 1875 required equal access to inns, theaters, and railroads regardless of race. Five consolidated prosecut...
Yick Wo v. Hopkins
San Francisco required wooden laundries to obtain operating permits, yet denied permits to virtually every Chinese applicant while...
Plessy v. Ferguson
Homer Plessy, seven-eighths white, was arrested for sitting in a whites-only railcar under Louisiana law in a deliberate test case...