Reynolds v. Sims
The Court held that both houses of state legislatures must be apportioned substantially by population.
Overview
Alabama's legislature malapportioned districts, giving sparsely populated rural counties legislative power wildly disproportionate to their populations. Chief Justice Warren, for an 8-1 majority, held that the Equal Protection Clause requires both houses of a bicameral state legislature to be apportioned substantially by population, rejecting a federal-style analogy of one house representing land area. Warren regarded it as his most important opinion. Legislative districting nationwide was redrawn, shifting power to cities and suburbs, and the principle that people, not land or trees, cast votes became fundamental to American democracy.
Related Topics
Dred Scott v. Sandford
Dred Scott, enslaved in Missouri, sued for freedom after residing in free states and territories with his owner. Chief Justice Tan...
Civil Rights Cases
The Civil Rights Act of 1875 required equal access to inns, theaters, and railroads regardless of race. Five consolidated prosecut...
Yick Wo v. Hopkins
San Francisco required wooden laundries to obtain operating permits, yet denied permits to virtually every Chinese applicant while...
Plessy v. Ferguson
Homer Plessy, seven-eighths white, was arrested for sitting in a whites-only railcar under Louisiana law in a deliberate test case...