Shelby County v. Holder
The Court struck down the Voting Rights Act's coverage formula, ending federal preclearance requirements.
Overview
Section 5 of the 1965 Voting Rights Act required jurisdictions with histories of discrimination, mostly in the South, to obtain federal approval before changing voting rules. Chief Justice Roberts, for a 5-4 majority, held that the coverage formula rested on decades-old data incompatible with current conditions and the equal sovereignty of states. Justice Ginsburg's dissent likened discarding preclearance to throwing away an umbrella in a rainstorm. Preclearance effectively ended immediately, prompting waves of state election law changes and repeated unsuccessful attempts by Congress to enact an updated formula.
Related Topics
Dred Scott v. Sandford
Dred Scott, enslaved in Missouri, sued for freedom after residing in free states and territories with his owner. Chief Justice Tan...
Civil Rights Cases
The Civil Rights Act of 1875 required equal access to inns, theaters, and railroads regardless of race. Five consolidated prosecut...
Yick Wo v. Hopkins
San Francisco required wooden laundries to obtain operating permits, yet denied permits to virtually every Chinese applicant while...
Plessy v. Ferguson
Homer Plessy, seven-eighths white, was arrested for sitting in a whites-only railcar under Louisiana law in a deliberate test case...