Standard Oil v. United States
The Court ordered the breakup of the Standard Oil monopoly and articulated the rule of reason for antitrust cases.
Overview
The government sued to dissolve John D. Rockefeller's Standard Oil trust, which controlled roughly ninety percent of American oil refining. Through Chief Justice White, the Court held that the Sherman Act barred only unreasonable restraints of trade, importing a common law rule of reason rather than condemning every restraint outright. Applying that standard, the Court found Standard Oil's systematic elimination of competitors unreasonable and ordered dissolution into dozens of separate companies. The rule of reason remains the governing framework of antitrust analysis, and the breakup ironically spawned successor companies that grew larger still.
Related Topics
Fletcher v. Peck
Georgia's legislature, corrupted by bribery in the Yazoo land sales, rescinded millions of acres of grants, punishing innocent pur...
Dartmouth College v. Woodward
New Hampshire's legislature sought to convert private Dartmouth College into a public university after a trusteeship dispute. The ...
Charles River Bridge v. Warren Bridge
The Charles River Bridge Company claimed its charter implicitly barred Massachusetts from authorizing a competing toll bridge, arg...
Santa Clara County v. Southern Pacific Railroad
Southern Pacific Railroad challenged county property tax assessments on fences along its rights of way. Before oral argument, Chie...