Students for Fair Admissions v. Harvard
The Court held that race-conscious admissions programs at Harvard and UNC violate equal protection and Title VI.
Overview
Students for Fair Admissions challenged admissions programs considering race at Harvard and the University of North Carolina. Chief Justice Roberts, for a 6-3 and 6-2 majority in the paired cases, held that the racial classifications lacked sufficiently measurable objectives and employed race in a stereotyped way, overruling the central holdings of Grutter and Bakke. Universities may still consider how race has affected an applicant's life when discussed in essays. The decision ended explicit race-conscious admissions at selective schools nationwide, reshaping American higher education.
Related Topics
Dred Scott v. Sandford
Dred Scott, enslaved in Missouri, sued for freedom after residing in free states and territories with his owner. Chief Justice Tan...
Civil Rights Cases
The Civil Rights Act of 1875 required equal access to inns, theaters, and railroads regardless of race. Five consolidated prosecut...
Yick Wo v. Hopkins
San Francisco required wooden laundries to obtain operating permits, yet denied permits to virtually every Chinese applicant while...
Plessy v. Ferguson
Homer Plessy, seven-eighths white, was arrested for sitting in a whites-only railcar under Louisiana law in a deliberate test case...