Texas v. Johnson
The Court held that burning the American flag in protest is protected symbolic speech.
Overview
Gregory Lee Johnson burned a flag outside the 1984 Republican National Convention in Dallas and was convicted under a Texas law protecting venerated objects. Justice Brennan, for a 5-4 majority, held that flag burning is expressive conduct, and that the government may not prohibit expression merely because society finds the underlying idea offensive; the bedrock principle is that government cannot forbid ideas because they are disagreeable. Johnson triggered national outrage, failed constitutional amendment attempts, and a federal Flag Protection Act invalidated the next year. The case stands as a First Amendment landmark protecting dissent, however provocative.
Related Topics
Schenck v. United States
Charles Schenck, a socialist party official, circulated leaflets urging draftees to resist World War I conscription. Justice Holme...
Abrams v. United States
Jacob Abrams and four co-defendants printed leaflets attacking American intervention in Russia and urging workers to strike. The C...
Gitlow v. New York
Benjamin Gitlow, a socialist assemblyman, was convicted for publishing a manifesto advocating revolutionary socialism. The Court a...
Near v. Minnesota
Minnesota's public nuisance law allowed courts to shut down scandal-mongering newspapers. The Saturday Press, an anti-Semitic week...