Batson v. Kentucky
The Court held that prosecutors may not use peremptory challenges to exclude jurors because of their race.
Overview
At James Batson's burglary trial in Louisville, the prosecutor used peremptory strikes to remove all four Black people from the jury pool, leaving an all-white jury. Justice Lewis Powell, writing for a 7-2 majority in 1986, held that the Equal Protection Clause forbids race-based strikes and eased the heavy burden of proof that Swain v. Alabama had imposed on defendants. The decision created a three-step procedure: the defendant makes a prima facie showing, the prosecutor offers a race-neutral explanation, and the judge decides whether discrimination occurred. The Court later extended Batson to civil cases, to strikes by defense counsel, and to sex-based strikes.
Related Topics
Powell v. Alabama
Nine Black teenagers were hastily tried and sentenced to death for allegedly raping two white women on an Alabama train, with a la...
Mapp v. Ohio
Cleveland police forced their way into Dollree Mapp's home without a valid warrant, allegedly searching for a bombing suspect, and...
Gideon v. Wainwright
Clarence Earl Gideon, tried for breaking into a Florida poolroom, was denied a court-appointed lawyer because Florida appointed co...
Miranda v. Arizona
Ernesto Miranda confessed to kidnapping and rape after two hours of police interrogation without being told of his rights. Chief J...