Gregg v. Georgia
The Court upheld revised death penalty statutes with guided jury discretion, ending the four-year national moratorium.
Overview
Georgia rewrote its capital statute after Furman, requiring separate trials for guilt and sentencing, statutory aggravating circumstances, and automatic appellate review. The Court held that the death penalty is not inherently cruel and unusual for murder, and that careful channeling of jury discretion could cure the arbitrariness that doomed the old statutes. Executions resumed in 1977 after a decade-long pause. Gregg, with companion cases, restored capital punishment nationally and sustained it against later statistical challenges, even as states have increasingly restricted or abolished the penalty in recent years.
Related Topics
Powell v. Alabama
Nine Black teenagers were hastily tried and sentenced to death for allegedly raping two white women on an Alabama train, with a la...
Mapp v. Ohio
Cleveland police forced their way into Dollree Mapp's home without a valid warrant, allegedly searching for a bombing suspect, and...
Gideon v. Wainwright
Clarence Earl Gideon, tried for breaking into a Florida poolroom, was denied a court-appointed lawyer because Florida appointed co...
Miranda v. Arizona
Ernesto Miranda confessed to kidnapping and rape after two hours of police interrogation without being told of his rights. Chief J...