Hamdan v. Rumsfeld
The Court struck down the military commissions at Guantanamo Bay as unauthorized by law.
Overview
Salim Hamdan, once a driver for Osama bin Laden, faced trial by military commission established by executive order. Justice Stevens, for a 5-3 majority, held that the commissions violated the Uniform Code of Military Justice and Common Article 3 of the Geneva Conventions, lacking congressional authorization and required procedural protections. The decision rebuked unilateral executive war powers and prompted Congress to enact the Military Commissions Act, a provision of which was later invalidated in Boumediene. Hamdan remains a landmark on the limits of executive authority in wartime.
Related Topics
The Prize Cases
Union ships seized vessels trading with the Confederacy under Lincoln's 1861 blockade proclamation, issued without a congressional...
United States v. Nixon
The Watergate special prosecutor subpoenaed tapes and documents after cover-up indictments, and Nixon claimed absolute executive p...
Hamdi v. Rumsfeld
Yaser Esam Hamdi, an American citizen captured in Afghanistan, was held in a Navy brig without charges. Justice O'Connor, announci...
Youngstown Sheet & Tube Co. v. Sawyer
Facing a nationwide steel strike during the Korean War in 1952, President Harry Truman ordered Commerce Secretary Charles Sawyer t...