The Prize Cases
The Court upheld President Lincoln's blockade of southern ports as a lawful response to insurrection, recognizing broad executive war powers.
Overview
Union ships seized vessels trading with the Confederacy under Lincoln's 1861 blockade proclamation, issued without a congressional declaration of war. Shipowners argued the seizures were unlawful because Congress had not authorized war. Justice Grier, for a 5-4 majority, held that a state of civil war existed as a matter of fact, and that the President as commander in chief could respond to sudden attack and insurrection without waiting for Congress. The decision recognized that the executive may act militarily when the nation is attacked, an early pillar of modern executive power doctrine, while leaving the boundaries of that power contested.
Related Topics
United States v. Nixon
The Watergate special prosecutor subpoenaed tapes and documents after cover-up indictments, and Nixon claimed absolute executive p...
Hamdi v. Rumsfeld
Yaser Esam Hamdi, an American citizen captured in Afghanistan, was held in a Navy brig without charges. Justice O'Connor, announci...
Hamdan v. Rumsfeld
Salim Hamdan, once a driver for Osama bin Laden, faced trial by military commission established by executive order. Justice Steven...
Youngstown Sheet & Tube Co. v. Sawyer
Facing a nationwide steel strike during the Korean War in 1952, President Harry Truman ordered Commerce Secretary Charles Sawyer t...