Gibbons v. Ogden
The Court held that navigation between states is interstate commerce subject to congressional regulation, displacing state-granted monopolies.
Overview
Robert Fulton and Robert Livingston held a New York steamboat monopoly that Aaron Ogden licensed, while Thomas Gibbons operated under a federal coastal license. Chief Justice Marshall defined commerce as commercial intercourse extending to navigation and held that the Commerce Clause vests in Congress the power to regulate commerce among the several states, which states cannot override. Although the Court acknowledged state police powers, it struck the monopoly as conflicting with federal law. Gibbons became the seedbed of modern commerce clause doctrine, from antitrust and labor regulation to civil rights statutes.
Related Topics
Marbury v. Madison
William Marbury petitioned for a writ of mandamus after his midnight judicial commission went undelivered by the incoming Jefferso...
Martin v. Hunter's Lessee
Lord Fairfax, a British loyalist, left Virginia lands to his nephew Denny Martin. Virginia confiscated and sold part of the land, ...
McCulloch v. Maryland
Maryland taxed the Baltimore branch of the Second Bank of the United States, and bank cashier James McCulloch refused to pay. Chie...
Johnson v. M'Intosh
Thomas Johnson bought land from Piankeshaw tribes in 1773, and William M'Intosh later obtained a patent for the same land from the...