McCulloch v. Maryland
The Court held that Congress has implied powers to establish a national bank and that states cannot tax federal instrumentalities.
Overview
Maryland taxed the Baltimore branch of the Second Bank of the United States, and bank cashier James McCulloch refused to pay. Chief Justice Marshall, for a unanimous Court, reasoned that the Necessary and Proper Clause granted Congress discretion to choose means for executing enumerated powers, and that the bank was a constitutional instrument. He further declared that the power to tax involves the power to destroy, so states may not burden federal institutions. McCulloch established the doctrine of implied congressional powers and federal immunity from state taxation, becoming perhaps the most cited case in federalism jurisprudence.
Related Topics
Marbury v. Madison
William Marbury petitioned for a writ of mandamus after his midnight judicial commission went undelivered by the incoming Jefferso...
Martin v. Hunter's Lessee
Lord Fairfax, a British loyalist, left Virginia lands to his nephew Denny Martin. Virginia confiscated and sold part of the land, ...
Gibbons v. Ogden
Robert Fulton and Robert Livingston held a New York steamboat monopoly that Aaron Ogden licensed, while Thomas Gibbons operated un...
Johnson v. M'Intosh
Thomas Johnson bought land from Piankeshaw tribes in 1773, and William M'Intosh later obtained a patent for the same land from the...