Martin v. Hunter's Lessee
The Court held that it has appellate authority over state courts on questions of federal law, settling a foundational dispute about the judiciary's structure.
Overview
Lord Fairfax, a British loyalist, left Virginia lands to his nephew Denny Martin. Virginia confiscated and sold part of the land, and a dispute arose over whether treaties protecting loyalist property controlled. Justice Joseph Story wrote for the Court, affirming that Section 25 of the Judiciary Act authorized Supreme Court review of state court decisions rejecting federal claims. The ruling rejected the idea that state courts could be the final arbiters of federal law, ensuring uniform interpretation of treaties, statutes, and the Constitution nationwide. Martin remains a pillar of the federal judicial system and the supremacy of federal law.
Related Topics
Marbury v. Madison
William Marbury petitioned for a writ of mandamus after his midnight judicial commission went undelivered by the incoming Jefferso...
McCulloch v. Maryland
Maryland taxed the Baltimore branch of the Second Bank of the United States, and bank cashier James McCulloch refused to pay. Chie...
Gibbons v. Ogden
Robert Fulton and Robert Livingston held a New York steamboat monopoly that Aaron Ogden licensed, while Thomas Gibbons operated un...
Johnson v. M'Intosh
Thomas Johnson bought land from Piankeshaw tribes in 1773, and William M'Intosh later obtained a patent for the same land from the...