Ableman v. Booth
The Court held that state courts cannot override federal court decisions, reinforcing federal judicial supremacy.
Overview
Sherman Booth, a Wisconsin abolitionist jailed for helping a fugitive slave escape, was freed by the Wisconsin Supreme Court, which declared the Fugitive Slave Act unconstitutional and ordered his release from federal custody. Chief Justice Taney, for a unanimous Court, held that state courts lacked power to review or interfere with federal judgments, and that Wisconsin's nullification attempt was incompatible with the constitutional order. Though arising from the slavery controversy, Ableman established the enduring principle that federal court decisions bind state courts, later invoked during the school desegregation crises of the twentieth century.
Related Topics
Marbury v. Madison
William Marbury petitioned for a writ of mandamus after his midnight judicial commission went undelivered by the incoming Jefferso...
Martin v. Hunter's Lessee
Lord Fairfax, a British loyalist, left Virginia lands to his nephew Denny Martin. Virginia confiscated and sold part of the land, ...
McCulloch v. Maryland
Maryland taxed the Baltimore branch of the Second Bank of the United States, and bank cashier James McCulloch refused to pay. Chie...
Gibbons v. Ogden
Robert Fulton and Robert Livingston held a New York steamboat monopoly that Aaron Ogden licensed, while Thomas Gibbons operated un...