Barron v. Baltimore
The Court held that the Bill of Rights restricted only the federal government, not the states.
Overview
John Barron sued Baltimore for ruining his wharf when the city diverted streams during road work, claiming a Fifth Amendment takings violation. Chief Justice Marshall wrote for a unanimous Court that the first ten amendments were enacted to limit federal power and did not apply to state governments, whose citizens must look to their own state constitutions for protection. Barron held sway until the Fourteenth Amendment opened the door to incorporation, and nearly every Bill of Rights protection has since been applied to the states through the due process clause, making the decision a historical marker rather than current law.
Related Topics
Marbury v. Madison
William Marbury petitioned for a writ of mandamus after his midnight judicial commission went undelivered by the incoming Jefferso...
Martin v. Hunter's Lessee
Lord Fairfax, a British loyalist, left Virginia lands to his nephew Denny Martin. Virginia confiscated and sold part of the land, ...
McCulloch v. Maryland
Maryland taxed the Baltimore branch of the Second Bank of the United States, and bank cashier James McCulloch refused to pay. Chie...
Gibbons v. Ogden
Robert Fulton and Robert Livingston held a New York steamboat monopoly that Aaron Ogden licensed, while Thomas Gibbons operated un...