INS v. Chadha
The Court struck down the one-house legislative veto as violating the Constitution's bicameralism and presentment requirements.
Overview
Congress allowed either house to veto executive actions implementing statutes, such as the suspension of Jagdish Chadha's deportation. The Court held that whenever Congress takes action with legal effect, it must pass both houses and present the measure to the President; a one-house veto exercises legislative power without following constitutional procedure. The decision invalidated provisions in hundreds of statutes, shifting regulatory oversight toward notice-and-comment rulemaking and appropriations politics. Chadha remains a central separation-of-powers precedent about the procedures Congress must follow to act.
Related Topics
Marbury v. Madison
William Marbury petitioned for a writ of mandamus after his midnight judicial commission went undelivered by the incoming Jefferso...
Martin v. Hunter's Lessee
Lord Fairfax, a British loyalist, left Virginia lands to his nephew Denny Martin. Virginia confiscated and sold part of the land, ...
McCulloch v. Maryland
Maryland taxed the Baltimore branch of the Second Bank of the United States, and bank cashier James McCulloch refused to pay. Chie...
Gibbons v. Ogden
Robert Fulton and Robert Livingston held a New York steamboat monopoly that Aaron Ogden licensed, while Thomas Gibbons operated un...