McGirt v. Oklahoma
The Court held that much of eastern Oklahoma remains a Creek reservation for purposes of federal criminal law.
Overview
Jimcy McGirt was convicted in Oklahoma court for crimes on land the Creek Nation claimed under nineteenth-century treaties. Justice Gorsuch, for a 5-4 majority, held that Congress never disestablished the Creek reservation, so under the Major Crimes Act federal rather than state courts have jurisdiction over Indian country crimes. The ruling, grounded in the text of treaties and the solemn promises of the United States, honored reservation boundaries at the expense of a century of state practice, transferring thousands of prosecutions to federal and tribal courts.
Related Topics
Marbury v. Madison
William Marbury petitioned for a writ of mandamus after his midnight judicial commission went undelivered by the incoming Jefferso...
Martin v. Hunter's Lessee
Lord Fairfax, a British loyalist, left Virginia lands to his nephew Denny Martin. Virginia confiscated and sold part of the land, ...
McCulloch v. Maryland
Maryland taxed the Baltimore branch of the Second Bank of the United States, and bank cashier James McCulloch refused to pay. Chie...
Gibbons v. Ogden
Robert Fulton and Robert Livingston held a New York steamboat monopoly that Aaron Ogden licensed, while Thomas Gibbons operated un...